Take yourself to greater depths right from your desktop with SPE Webinars and Online Education.
Join our industry experts as they explore solutions to real problems and discuss trending topics.

Catalog Advanced Search

Search by Categories
Search in Packages
Search by Format
Search by Date Range
Products are filtered by different dates, depending on the combination of live and on-demand components that they contain, and on whether any live components are over or not.
Start
End
Search by Keyword
Sort By
  • First-Ever Environmental Characterization of Hydraulic Fracturing for Shale Oil and Gas Production

    Contains 2 Component(s), Includes Credits Recorded On: 03/08/2018

    Presented by Daniel Tormey

    The well completion process of high volume hydraulic fracturing has become a touchstone for opposition to the development of oil and gas resources from shale source rocks. Although the development of shale gas and oil has brought substantial economic, geopolitical, and climate change benefits to the United States, hydraulic fracturing has displaced global climate change as the most controversial environmental policy issue. As other countries evaluate development of shale oil and gas, these same environmental concerns are available on the internet and media sources. Without data, the concerns become a substantial hindrance to acceptance of shale gas development.

    This study presents the first-ever peer-reviewed study that quantifies the effects of two specific high-volume hydraulic fracturing jobs to 14 different environmental resource categories. The objective was to provide factual information supported by a high-quality dataset to guide policy making. None of the measurements detected a change due to hydraulic fracturing, including microseismic effects, ground motion and induced seismicity, water quality, methane migration, community health, well integrity, fracture containment to the target zone, and others.  

    The hydraulic fracturing occurred in the center of Los Angeles, California, at the largest urban oil field in the US. The level of community and regional concern, the breadth of the study, and many of the results are applicable to other shale oil and gas areas worldwide. The results provide the first dataset that addresses the range of concerns directly, and finds no adverse effects to any of the environmental resource categories. The results have subsequently been used at state and national levels in the United States to further the understanding of these issues.

    Dr. Daniel Tormey

    Energy, Water, and Land Management Expert

    Dr. Tormey is an expert in energy, water, and land management, and he conducts environmental reviews for both government and industry. He works with the environmental aspects of all types of energy development, with an emphasis on oil and gas, including hydraulic fracturing and produced water management, pipelines, LNG terminals, refineries and retail facilities. He has a Ph.D. in Geology and Geochemistry from MIT, and a B.S. in Civil Engineering and Geology from Stanford. He is President of Catalyst Environmental Solutions.  He was named by the National Academy of Sciences to the Science Advisory Board for Giant Sequoia National Monument; is a Distinguished Lecturer for the Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE); is a member of the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Geoscientist Specialist Group; is on the review committee on behalf of IUCN for the UNESCO World Heritage Site List; is volcanologist for Cruz del Sur, an emergency response and contingency planning organization in Chile; was an Executive in Residence at California Polytechnic University San Luis Obispo; is a Professional Geologist in California; and is a Fellow of The Explorers Club. He has worked throughout the USA, Australia, Indonesia, Italy, Chile, Argentina, Ecuador, Colombia, Venezuela, Brazil, Senegal, South Africa, Armenia and the Republic of Georgia.

    SPE Webinars are FREE to members courtesy of the

    image
  • Module 2: SEC Reserves Reporting Requirements

    Contains 2 Component(s), Includes Credits Recorded On: 03/08/2018

    This module will summarize major SEC reporting requirements.

    As part of its reserves modernization effort in 2008, the SEC issued new requirements for reporting reserves in filings with the Commission. These reserves reporting requirements have no parallel in either PRMS or in pre-2008 SEC regulations. This module will summarize major SEC reporting requirements.

    To purchase this course as part of the series, go to: SEC Reserves Reporting Regulations Series.

    Dr. W. John Lee

    Von Gonten Chair in Petroleum Engineering, Texas A&M University

    Dr. Lee holds BS, MS and PhD degrees in chemical engineering from the Georgia Institute of Technology. Early in his career, John worked for ExxonMobil and specialized in integrated reservoir studies. He later joined the Petroleum Engineering faculty at Texas A&M, and became Regents Professor of Petroleum Engineering. While at A&M, he also served as a consultant with S.A. Holditch & Associates, where he specialized in reservoir engineering aspects of unconventional gas resources. Professor Lee joined the University of Houston faculty in September 2011 and held the Cullen Distinguished University Chair until September 2015, when he rejoined the Texas A&M Faculty. He served as an Academic Engineering Fellow with the U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission (SEC) in Washington during 2007-2008, and was a principal architect of the modernized SEC rules for reporting oil and gas reserves. John and his team received the SEC’s Law and Policy Award in 2009. Professor Lee is the author/co-author of four textbooks published by SPE and has received numerous awards from SPE, including the Lucas Medal, the DeGolyer Distinguished Service Medal and Honorary Membership. He has received Distinguished Achievement and Honorary Life Member Awards from SPEE and is a member of the U.S. National Academy of Engineering and the Russian Academy of Natural Sciences.

    SPE Webinars are FREE to members courtesy of the

    image

  • Mechanical Integrity Lessons Learned from API Process Safety Site Assessments: Driving Operational Excellence

    Contains 2 Component(s), Includes Credits Recorded On: 03/08/2018

    The API Process Safety Site Assessment Program was developed in 2011.This presentation will provide an overview of the program and present some of the mechanical integrity learnings, trends and benchmarking data developed from the assessments based on the five-year history of the program.

    The API Process Safety Site Assessment Program was developed in 2011 as part of the AFPM and API Advancing Process Safety Programs.  PSSAP began conducting assessments in 2012. By the end of 2017, the API Site Assessment program will have conducted 59 General (7 protocols) and 34 HF Alkylation/RP 751 assessments. These assessments have been conducted 63 different refineries and petrochemical facilities. The areas assessed are: Process Safety Leadership, Management of Change, Mechanical Integrity, Safe Work Practices, Operating Practices, Facility Siting, Process Hazards Analysis, and HF Alkylation/RP 751. Mechanical integrity typically scores 10 percentage points lower than the other areas. This presentation will provide an overview of the program and present some of the mechanical integrity learnings, trends and benchmarking data developed from the assessments based on the five-year history of the program.

    Chad Patschke

    CPSA

    Mr. Patschke has more than 20 years of experience in maintenance; mechanical integrity (MI); process safety management (PSM); and various engineering assignments involving operations, maintenance, process safety, and project management. He has held the positions of plant manager, operations manager, production superintendent, engineering manager, and materials engineer.

    He has both domestic and international experience in a variety of industries that have processes involving highly hazardous chemicals, including refining, oil and gas production (both onshore and offshore), petrochemical, LNG, specialty chemical, pharmaceutical, fertilizer, consumer products, ammonia refrigeration, and hazardous waste treatment operations. He has taught numerous training courses on mechanical integrity and understanding RAGAGEPs, and has written numerous articles on related topics.

    Currently Mr. Patschke assists clients with all aspects of MI as well as PSM program development, implementation, and auditing to satisfy U.S. OSHA’s PSM regulation, U.S. EPA’s RMP rule, U.S. BSEE’s SEMS rule, internal company standards, and good industry practices. He also leads and participates on teams investigating MI-related incidents and provides expert witness services to clients.

    Mr. Patschke is an active member of the API Committee on Refinery Equipment and the Subcommittee on Inspection. He is a Certified Process Safety Auditor (CPSA) and was selected to participate on the joint API/AFPM Process Safety Site Assessment team for conducting site assessments and API RP 751, Safe Operation of HF alkylation unit audits at multiple refineries throughout the U.S. Mr. Patschke previously held inspector certifications for API 510 Pressure Vessels, API 653 Atmospheric Storage Tanks, and API 570 Process Piping, and he has developed and managed MI programs for a variety of companies.

    SPE Webinars are FREE to members courtesy of the

    image
  • Risk not Chance, STEM Student Risk Awareness

    Contains 1 Component(s)

    These videos help the end user recognize we encounter risk every day, and we mitigate this risk by introducing barriers.​

    The goal of the Risk Not Chance project is to increase risk awareness, and improve the understanding of risk and choice for STEM students. This project aims to increase the understanding of how risk plays a role in our everyday lives, how it can be misunderstood and how we use it to make decisions. These videos help the end user recognize we encounter risk every day, and we mitigate this risk by introducing barriers.

    Thank you to the United Engineering Foundation for supporting the creation of these videos. Without their support, these videos would have never been possible. Please visit https://www.uefoundation.org/ for more information about this project and others.

  • Risk not Chance, First Responders Risk Awareness

    Contains 1 Component(s)

    These videos help the end user recognize we encounter risk every day, and we mitigate this risk by introducing barriers.

    First responders have a unique role and perspective when dealing with safety at industrial sites. While this video is largely aimed at first responders, it’s a great way for chemical engineers to understand their role and perspective when dealing with industrial facilities. Understand what they require and why, and learn how their emergency response plan prioritizes to manage risk for them, the surrounding community, and those at the facility. 

    This video is part of the Risk Not Chance project, which was designed to increase risk awareness, and improve the understanding of risk and choice for first responders. The project aims to increase the understanding of how risk plays a role in our everyday lives, how it can be misunderstood and how we use it to make decisions. These videos help the end user recognize we encounter risk every day, and we mitigate this risk by introducing barriers.

    Thank you to the United Engineering Foundation for supporting the creation of these videos. Without their support, these videos would have never been possible. Please visit https://www.uefoundation.org/ for more information about this project and others.



  • Risk not Chance, Community Risk Awareness

    Contains 1 Component(s)

    These videos help the end user recognize we encounter risk every day, and we mitigate this risk by introducing barriers.

    The goal of the Risk Not Chance project is to increase risk awareness, and improve the understanding of risk and choice for the community. This project aims to increase the understanding of how risk plays a role in our everyday lives, how it can be misunderstood and how we use it to make decisions. These videos help the end user recognize we encounter risk every day, and we mitigate this risk by introducing barriers.

    Thank you to the United Engineering Foundation for supporting the creation of these videos. Without their support, these videos would have never been possible. Please visit https://www.uefoundation.org/ for more information about this project and others.

  • Module 1: SEC Reserves Definitions

    Contains 2 Component(s), Includes Credits Recorded On: 03/01/2018

    This module will review the major SEC definitions and will identify major contrasts with PRMS.

    The SEC issued its latest definitions to be used as the basis for reserves filings in late 2008. These definitions are broadly similar to the definitions presented in the SPE Petroleum Resources Management System (PRMS), but differ in significant ways in a few instances. This module will review the major SEC definitions and will identify major contrasts with PRMS. 

    To purchase this course as part of the series, go to: SEC Reserves Reporting Regulations Series.

    Dr. W. John Lee

    Von Gonten Chair in Petroleum Engineering, Texas A&M University

    Dr. Lee holds BS, MS and PhD degrees in chemical engineering from the Georgia Institute of Technology. Early in his career, John worked for ExxonMobil and specialized in integrated reservoir studies. He later joined the Petroleum Engineering faculty at Texas A&M, and became Regents Professor of Petroleum Engineering. While at A&M, he also served as a consultant with S.A. Holditch & Associates, where he specialized in reservoir engineering aspects of unconventional gas resources. Professor Lee joined the University of Houston faculty in September 2011 and held the Cullen Distinguished University Chair until September 2015, when he rejoined the Texas A&M Faculty. He served as an Academic Engineering Fellow with the U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission (SEC) in Washington during 2007-2008, and was a principal architect of the modernized SEC rules for reporting oil and gas reserves. John and his team received the SEC’s Law and Policy Award in 2009. Professor Lee is the author/co-author of four textbooks published by SPE and has received numerous awards from SPE, including the Lucas Medal, the DeGolyer Distinguished Service Medal and Honorary Membership. He has received Distinguished Achievement and Honorary Life Member Awards from SPEE and is a member of the U.S. National Academy of Engineering and the Russian Academy of Natural Sciences.

    SPE Webinars are FREE to members courtesy of the

    image

  • An Improved Well Path Tortuosity Model

    Contains 2 Component(s), Includes Credits Recorded On: 02/28/2018

    Wellbore tortuosity is a critical element in drilling complex horizontal wells and deep verticals. The current three-dimensional borehole trajectory model, based on the minimum curvature method [MCM], tends to mathematically smoothen the wellpath.

    Wellbore tortuosity is a critical element in drilling complex horizontal wells and deep verticals. The current three-dimensional borehole trajectory model, based on the minimum curvature method [MCM], tends to mathematically smoothen the wellpath. This is due to the assumption that the borehole is composed of constant curvature arcs. This assumption creates an artificially low tortuosity expressed as dogleg severity [DLS] which leads to the miscalculation of borehole positions, and generating unreliable prediction of torque and drag. A robust three-dimensional trajectory model, the Advanced Spline-Curve [ASC] model, is developed to overcome these limitations. The ASC model provides realistic results and accurately calculates the spatial course of the wellpath. Various applications of the ASC model are presented including [1] production challenges such as ESP failures and liquid loading, [2] wellbore location affect to reservoir modeling and [3] tortuosity effects on torque and drag, limiting the horizontal distance to be drilled, and raising the question: “how far can you go?”.

    Dr. Mahmoud Abughaban

    Research Scientist, Saudi Aramco

    Dr. Abughaban is a research scientist at the Upstream Research and Development Center – Saudi Aramco. He received his Ph.D. in Petroleum Engineering from Colorado School of Mines. Dr. Abughaban has been actively involved in research projects in the drilling industry. Dr. Abughaban joined Saudi Aramco in 2008 as a Drilling Engineer both onshore and offshore. He has managed critical drilling operations and worked closely with Geologists, Reservoir Engineers and Production engineers to improve rig performance utilizing state of the art technologies and best practices. During his academic period, he has taught undergraduate and graduate courses in Petroleum Engineering. Dr. Abughaban is an active member of the Society of Petroleum Engineering (SPE) and a committee member of SPE-KSA Chapter.

    SPE Webinars are FREE to members courtesy of the

    image
  • Vertical Multiphase Flow Modeling In Wells And Risers

    Contains 2 Component(s), Includes Credits Recorded On: 02/22/2018

    The aim of the presentation is to show that vertical multiphase flow, which is known to have some very complex features, can be modeled well with 1D methods, using relatively simple assumptions.

    Accurate models for multiphase flows in vertical pipes are needed for the design and operation of hydrocarbon production systems. Examples of important application areas are:

    •       Predicting the time-of-death of gas wells.
    •       Predicting the correct flow rate in liquid-dominated production systems, especially for deep water risers.

    In this presentation we show how vertical multiphase flow can be modeled using a 1D approach. Specifically, we explain what kind of assumptions are needed, and which physical mechanisms require closure laws. Furthermore, we show some recent experimental work conducted at industrial conditions, aimed at deriving more accurate models, and we provide some examples of how the certain closure laws have been deduced from this new data. Finally, we assemble the new closures into a unified model, and compare the predicted pressure drop and liquid content with measured values for a large experimental database on vertical flow. We also test the new model against measurements made in a 3600 meters deep gas well, where we are able to match the measured onset of liquid loading.

    The aim of the presentation is to show that vertical multiphase flow, which is known to have some very complex features, can be modelled well with 1D methods, using relatively simple assumptions.

    Dr. Neeraj Zambare

    LedaFlow Product Director, Kongsberg Digital

    Dr. Zambare has been working with Kongsberg for 17 years now (2001 – current). His field of experience includes flow assurance and process modeling – specifically dynamic simulation related. He led teams to deliver engineering studies, operator training simulators and real-time online modeling on various project around the globe. Dr. Zambare has a MS/PhD in chemical engineering from Drexel Univ., Philadelphia. He is currently responsible for LedaFlow business globally.

    Dr. Jorn Kjolaas

    Senior Scientist, SINTEF Multiphase Flow Laboratory, Tiller

    Dr. Kjolaas has been at the SINTEF Multiphase Flow Laboratory for 16 years. His main fields of experience are experiments and modelling of multiphase flows. He has a PhD from NTNU under Prof. Ole Jørgen Nydal and is the Head of LedaFlow 1D hmodel development.


    SPE Webinars are FREE to members courtesy of the

    image
  • Completion Engineering: Maximizing Business Value through Multi-Discipline Integration

    Contains 2 Component(s), Includes Credits Recorded On: 02/13/2018

    Presented by Dan Gibson

    The Completion Engineer integrates the requirements of a number of other disciplines (Reservoir, Drilling, Production, etc) to maximize the value of a hydrocarbon resource.  This almost always requires evaluating competing and conflicting factors to determine the 'best' option for a particular problem.  This talk will demonstrate a decision making process that allows the stakeholders to compare various options in a fair and robust way.  Two real onshore or offshore examples will be reviewed depending on SPE chapter interest.   

    Participants will take away a new methodology on how to compare competing factors that influence a completion or well design.    

    Dan Gibson

    Senior Completions & Well Integrity Engineer

    With over 35 years of experience, Mr. Gibson has worked his way through the oil and gas production stream from Facilities and Production engineering to Completions in assignments across the USA and around the world (Gabon, Congo, Egypt, Scotland, Russia, and Australia).  This breadth of experience comes across in the presentation and his ability to deal with different audiences with a wide range of challenges.  

    He has authored or co-authored a number of papers ranging from polymer flood management to ice mechanics and most recently an innovative ICD system.  He is one of the most active members of SPE Connect where members can readily contact him with questions. 

    SPE Webinars are FREE to members courtesy of the

    image